<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Intelligent Design, Darwinism, and Ben Stein</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.section134.com/2007/11/03/intelligent-design-darwinism-and-ben-stein/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.section134.com/2007/11/03/intelligent-design-darwinism-and-ben-stein/</link>
	<description>Mormonism and Politics</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 02 Jan 2010 04:07:13 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	
	<item>
		<title>By: Ziersan</title>
		<link>http://www.section134.com/2007/11/03/intelligent-design-darwinism-and-ben-stein/comment-page-1/#comment-31</link>
		<dc:creator>Ziersan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Jan 2008 19:47:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.section134.com/2007/11/03/intelligent-design-darwinism-and-ben-stein/#comment-31</guid>
		<description>Hello, I found my way here from your blog at Townhall.com.
Very interesting post.  I don&#039;t have a problem with Evolution being taught in school as long as it&#039;s taught as a theory.  Since it&#039;s just a theory, I see no problem with other theories being taught as well.  Like others, I had assumed that teaching ID would inject religion into the classroom.  (not that I think that&#039;s bad, per se, but more because it&#039;s my job to teach my kids about religion and I worry what might be taught)  But presented in this way would be a good counter to the Darwinists.  One of the best presentations of the origin of life was from the Nova special &quot;Origins&quot;.  It just laid out what we already know.  This happened at this point in time, and this happened in this point in time, etc.  I was impressed with it.  In fact, it seemed to me that it inadvertently supported the Creation story in the bible.  It just occurred to me(if you don&#039;t mind me rambling) that it seems that the bible was way ahead of science in explaining the origin of life.  It&#039;s not the first time that science has told us things we already knew because we learned it in church.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hello, I found my way here from your blog at Townhall.com.<br />
Very interesting post.  I don&#8217;t have a problem with Evolution being taught in school as long as it&#8217;s taught as a theory.  Since it&#8217;s just a theory, I see no problem with other theories being taught as well.  Like others, I had assumed that teaching ID would inject religion into the classroom.  (not that I think that&#8217;s bad, per se, but more because it&#8217;s my job to teach my kids about religion and I worry what might be taught)  But presented in this way would be a good counter to the Darwinists.  One of the best presentations of the origin of life was from the Nova special &#8220;Origins&#8221;.  It just laid out what we already know.  This happened at this point in time, and this happened in this point in time, etc.  I was impressed with it.  In fact, it seemed to me that it inadvertently supported the Creation story in the bible.  It just occurred to me(if you don&#8217;t mind me rambling) that it seems that the bible was way ahead of science in explaining the origin of life.  It&#8217;s not the first time that science has told us things we already knew because we learned it in church.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

